On 17-03-06 11:55:27, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 05:01:23PM +0000, ng0 wrote: > > On 17-03-01 16:58:41, ng0 wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I already fixed some of the open issues with our package of 'mc'. > > > > > > I think people will expect features to just work and not being broken > > > (as they are right now). > > > My personal opinion ignored, how do you want to proceed? The vim way > > > where we have $package (basic, as small as it gets) and $package-full > > > (with all the features you can have enabled)? > > > > > > I'd like to hear your opionion so that I can proceed fixing mc with > > > what we agreed on. > > > > > > > And also your opinion, I don't know what an opionion is but it sounds > > like opium combined with onion and I don't want that. > > > > I've been sitting on a patch for ranger for a while. I also couldn't > decide between packaging just ranger or also linking in the various > programs it calls. > > I think that if mc would use libcaca to display an image, and just > installing libcaca in profile would satisfy that dependancy, then > leaving it out is "not great, but acceptable". > > -- > Efraim Flashner <efr...@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר > GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 > Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
It's not that easy. The references to applications are absolute using '/usr/{bin,sbin}' and similar ones. Maybe it's possible to just use the application name, but that depends on the context in the code, etc.