Hi ng0, On Sun, 5 Mar 2017 14:50:26 +0000 ng0 <contact....@cryptolab.net> wrote:
> What I take from the discussion is, all is good to go except for > subsystems. I'm okay with reviewing subsystems as an individual patch > later on. For me this works. Push the 3 patches, and send the subsystems > one later as a new discussion-bug. The 3 were pushed to master. Patch 4 not yet. So let's discuss. I have no preference for pairs or lists - it's just that the documentation should say what it actually expects - because the user has to write the form differently: Pair: '(a . b) List: '(a b) Those are not compatible with each other. (I think as the patch is written now it expects lists) And I'm against calling pairs "two-element tuple"s. It reminds me of these math joke equations which write the value 2 in a really complicated way (but correctly) :) And lists are definitely not two-element tuples. That would be seriously confusing. What do you think?
