Ludovic Courtès (2017-05-17 10:28 +0200) wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Alex Kost <[email protected]> skribis: > >> This is almost the same message as: >> >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-09/msg01570.html >> >> I mean this is a reminder on the subject. > > Yes, I haven’t forgotten about it, contrary to what one might think. > ;-)
Oh, great! (you're right, that's what I thought :-)) >> Ludovic, I think you suggested a good solution to a "Customizing >> /etc/profile" problem. Since I will no longer be a blocker of >> <http://bugs.gnu.org/20255> after this fix, would you like to commit >> that change, or are there any issues with that? > > In the message you cite above, I proposed to hack etc-service-type in > the same way we did for PAM. > > But then I think we’d better have the generic solution in place (where > any service could be extended “at the end”, i.e., after it’s ‘compose’ > and ‘extend’ procedures have been called) before people start relying on > the hack. I even started working on it long ago, and then moved on to > something else. Wow, a general solution for any service sounds really great! > I’m sorry that this has not happened yet. I hope to resume work on it > after the release, but if someone wants to give it a shot, I will > definitely not block it. I see :-) No hurry, I just was a bit concerned that your solution was lost, but now I know that it's not, thanks! -- Alex
