Mark H Weaver transcribed 1.2K bytes: > [email protected] (Kei Kebreau) writes: > > > kkebreau pushed a commit to branch master > > in repository guix. > > > > commit 0e4591bb696a36bc83f75869dd2711987b17b722 > > Author: ng0 <[email protected]> > > Date: Tue May 16 22:28:58 2017 +0000 > > > > gnu: Add s. > > > > * gnu/packages/shells.scm (s): New variable. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kei Kebreau <[email protected]> > > --- > > gnu/packages/shells.scm | 61 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/shells.scm b/gnu/packages/shells.scm > > index 5eeb186..5e04e86 100644 > > --- a/gnu/packages/shells.scm > > +++ b/gnu/packages/shells.scm > > @@ -503,6 +503,67 @@ Its features include: > > @end enumerate\n") > > (license bsd-2))) > > > > +(define-public s > > + (let ((commit "6604341edb3a775ff94415762af3ee9bd86bfb3c") > > + (revision "1")) > > + (package > > + (name "s") > > + (version (string-append "0.0.0-" revision "." (string-take commit > > 7))) > > I think we should rename this package and variable name to 's-shell' or > something along those lines. 's' is commonly used as a local variable > name. Single character variable names are in short supply, and I don't > think we should allocate them to packages. > > Thoughts? > > Mark
I did not think of this use, renaming to s-shell is okay. -- ng0 OpenPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
