Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> writes: > Kyle Meyer (2017-07-25 21:40 -0400) wrote: > >> Marius Bakke <mba...@fastmail.com> writes: >> >>> Wait, isn't this what --pure is for? I haven't followed the >>> discussion, but I would expect `guix environment` to *add* to my >>> current profile, and use '--pure' if I want a "clean" environment. >> >> I think the behavior here is unspecified because --pure is about >> unsetting shell variables while this is about how the load-path and >> autoloads are set up within an environment's Emacs instance. >> Conceptually, though, I agree that a --pure flag would match >> guix-emacs-autoload-packages considering only the environment's Emacs >> packages, whereas no --pure flag would match adding the environment's to >> the current profile's. >> >> But in the discussion so far, I've been assuming that currently there's >> not a direct way for guix-emacs-autoload-packages to detect if --pure >> was given. If that's not true, I'd be happy with the behavior you >> propose. > > I also don't see how you can detect from Emacs if it is running from > guix environment with --pure or without.
I don’t think you can, but we could pollute the environment some more by setting a variable that indicates that this is a pure environment…? -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net
