Hello ng0! Sorry for the long delay, I’m still on post-vacation email catch-up.
ng0 <[email protected]> skribis: > a rather long time ago we had a chat on wether I should > get group member privileges at savannah. Back then it > was rejected because "the quality of my contributions > should still improve" or what it was. > > I've sent another request about 2 weeks ago, now I > wanted to ask what the groups opinion about this. The process for commit rights is that current committers invite someone who they think can readily work on the repo according to our conventions and following the rules written in ‘HACKING’. Only a subset of the contributors are committers, but that’s OK: Git makes it easy to contribute anyway, and not every contributor wants to have some sort of long-term commitment with the project. Over time you have made lots of valuable contributions to the project in terms of patches, bug reports, etc. I have reviewed many of your patches and I find that I still often have a lot of work to do for various reasons (duplicate package, license check not done and package turned out to be non-free, lint issues, incomplete submissions). That’s why I did not offer you commit rights so far. We can discuss it in more detail if you want, possibly off-list. I’d like to stress that I appreciate your contributions and that I consider you a member of the group in the human sense of membership. Cheers, Ludo’.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
