Hello, Marius Bakke <mba...@fastmail.com> skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes: > >> Hi Mark, >> >> Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> skribis: >> >>> I've successfully updated my x86_64 GuixSD system to my private branch >>> based on 'core-updates' with recent 'master' and 'staging' merged into >>> it. This system includes a full GNOME desktop environment plus a few >>> programs based on Qt. It all works quite well. >>> >>> My branch includes a few draft fixes and workarounds that I haven't yet >>> pushed, but nothing that would require many rebuilds to update later. >>> >>> So, I think it might be time to ask Hydra to build all of core-updates, >>> after staging is merged into it. >> >> I agree. There was an issue with cross-compiling ‘bootstrap-tarballs’ >> that Marius reported a few days ago, which I’m looking into right now. >> I don’t expect the fix(es) to trigger a full rebuild. >> >> If Marius and others don’t object, I’d say go for it! > > No objections from me. However I do have a bunch of fairly innocent > updates in my queue, such as SQLite, Glib and CMake. It's also tempting > to get rid of that Perl graft. Is it too late for such changes? I think it’s OK for sqlite/glib/cmake, but changing Perl would further delay things, which perhaps is not desirable. > Hydra will be busy for a couple of days with 'master' and 'staging', so > there's little use in starting it immediately. It took me a couple of days to reply :-), so maybe we can start the evaluation now? We can also get berlin to build all of ‘core-updates’ if we want. Thanks, Ludo’.
