Oleg Pykhalov (2018-05-04 21:50 +0300) wrote: > In addion to my previous answer. > > Oleg Pykhalov <[email protected]> writes: > > […] > >>> 'let-alist' is a part of Emacs (that's why it was removed by commit >>> 469c7ce0¹). Is there a reason to add it? > > […] > >> Elpa importer could probably exclude ‘let-alist’ in ‘propagated-inputs’. > > Should I remove ‘let-alist’ now?
I am not the man to decide, but I would remove it :-) > Maybe we could implement exclude > mechanism for ‘let-alist’ and then remove ‘let-alist’? I don't understand what mechanism you mean. Why it cannot simply be removed? > ‘let-alist’ > shouln't clutter much if it stays in Guix package collection for a time. But why should it stay? Since Emacs includes it, and it is not a dependency for any package, I don't see a reason to keep it. -- Alex
