Ludovic Courtès writes:
Hello,
> Jan, could it be that the ‘basename’ and ‘dirname’ implementations in
> Gash fail this test? It might be that sed is not needed if you get
> these right.
Ah, yes! I have added some test to Gash and this
basename -- /
failed, producing the empty string, where coreutils' basename returns
`/'.
Gash "simply" (there is som if'ing involved) calls Guile's basename,
which disagrees here and returns "" for "/".
I'm assuming that this is expected behaviour for Guile?... so I
special-cased this for Gash' basename.
Greetings,
janneke
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com
