Ricardo Wurmus transcribed 659 bytes: > > n...@n0.is writes: > > > Let's not drop an architecture because occasionally something breaks for > > it. breakage is bad, yes. but it's more than just the broken packages. > > it is the way patches find their way into master. if you have more > > patience then I had, you can try to address the workflow in guix (there > > will be some past discussions you can find on the mailinglists). > > > > I've been on the high-friction lane with GuixSD, so I am talking from > > experience and not just assumptions. > > I don’t understand what you are alluding to. Could you please > elaborate? Could you translate this into concrete suggestions or > expectations?
I've suggested enough over the years and it was always "oh, good idea". Whoever wants to improve the state of simply commiting to master etc can do it, I myself no longer care (which I don't mean in a negative sense, I just have enough other things to focus on). > -- > Ricardo >