Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <m...@tobias.gr> writes: >> All in all, I’m in favor of switching back to the previous behavior: >> considering user shells as system config. That’s a one-line change >> in >> (gnu build accounts). > > +1!
+1 from me as well. Allowing the shell to be declaratively defined in the system config, but also allowing a user to override it permanently at runtime via chsh, seems like a nice middle ground between treating it as "config" vs. "state". I think in Guix System it is generally better to treat as much as possible as "config". After all, Guix System is basically an exercise in extending the functional software deployment model to whole-system management, right? -- Chris
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
