Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support> wrote: > * Alexander Vdolainen <a...@vapaa.xyz> [2019-10-09 23:13]: > - and then within that group there is now a hostile takeover group of people > starting with Ludovic Courtès and his "fellows" where none of them could > answer my email to provide me with the facts about their statement. They are > behaving against established implicit and explicit GNU guidelines, and so far > nobody from FSF is enforcing any policy against them. They are danger to GNU > project. > > My solution would be radical and simple: ask them to refrain damaging GNU > project, or fork their software, and expell them from GNU project. > > AS SIMPLE AS THAT.
Wow! Ease off a bit! You might not noticed that, but today Guix is the most vivid part of GNU. And I could not image an action, that might cause more damage to GNU project, than urging Guix lead developers to leave. Even if you believe that forking software over political discord is good thing to do (despite it does not align well with the rest of your message), by all means, you would not able to outcompete them, so it would simply ended in Guix out of GNU. So it even more harmful than urging RMS to leave. After all, RMS is mortal and, alas, will leave us and GNU sooner or later, while Guix is not necessary.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
