On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 2:20 PM Raghav Gururajan <raghavgurura...@disroot.org> wrote: > > I completely agree with you. The way you explained, does show that Guix > comply with FSDG. The thing is, the semantics used in current version > of FSDG does not explain things well. That's why I pointed out that > FSDG require revision, such that this new scenario is included in FSDG. > So that Guix or any future distros that gonna use same/similar > mechanism, does not pose confusion to readers of FSDG. That is all. :-)
Glad that we're in agreement. :) - Dave
