Arun Isaac <arunis...@systemreboot.net> writes:
> Indeed, I found the bug and fixed it. Please find attached the updated > code. Also, the inverted index hash table stores package objects instead > of package names and all comparisons are now done with eq?. This gets us > an even higher speedup of around 300x. > > Built index in 8.556596040725708 seconds > Brute force search took 0.4107058048248291 seconds > Inverted index search took 0.0012979507446289062 seconds Neat! We could build and install the index when Guix is built and installed and then use it for the search. I can’t think of a downside to adopting an index compared to what we have now. -- Ricardo
