We could add all the dependencies declared in the original asd files (by 'defsystem-depends-on' and 'depends-on') to the generated asd files with the following patch:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- From 7e2009177137b3ad5831b5c42d9a4387d408bc57 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <g...@posteo.net> Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 18:07:37 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] build: lisp-utils: Take defsystem dependencies into consideration. * guix/build/lisp-utils.scm (system-dependencies): Add the dependencies declared with ':defsystem-depends-on' in asd-file to the list of dependencies. --- guix/build/lisp-utils.scm | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/guix/build/lisp-utils.scm b/guix/build/lisp-utils.scm index c7a589c902..cce8047d61 100644 --- a/guix/build/lisp-utils.scm +++ b/guix/build/lisp-utils.scm @@ -165,10 +165,11 @@ asdf:system-depends-on. First load the system's ASD-FILE." (asdf:load-asd (truename ,asd-file) :name ,(normalize-string system)) (with-open-file (stream ,deps-file :direction :output) - (format stream - "~s~%" - (asdf:system-depends-on - (asdf:find-system ,system)))))) + (let* ((sys (asdf:find-system ,system)) + (deps (union (asdf:system-defsystem-depends-on sys) + (asdf:system-depends-on sys) + :test (function equal)))) + (format stream "~s~%" deps))))) (dynamic-wind (lambda _ -- 2.25.0 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- With this patch, we might need to add some inputs to a few Lisp packages, but probably not a lot of them. Do you think this patch would be a good idea, or do you see some cases where it could break something?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature