Am 31.01.20 um 19:50 schrieb John Soo: >> On Jan 29, 2020, at 11:01 AM, Andreas Rottmann <m...@r0tty.org> wrote: >> >> I'm a new to Guix, and am not sure what you mean by "safely" and >> "unwanted store outputs". Running `cargo test` takes the crate source, >> and the closure of any `dependencies` and `dev-dependencies`, and >> produces no real artifacts that make sense to put in the store, as far >> as I can see. The only noteworthy artifact is the stdout/stderr ouput >> produced, as well as the exit status, but I guess that's not relevant to >> the store. > Oh I could see how “safely” would be confusing. I meant that we would not > populate anything in the store as you suggest.
If `cargo test` does not "install" any file - and this is what I would expect it to do, since this is what `cargo install` - running `cargo test` is save. Neither the exit status nor the stderr/stdout output are effecting the store. > What do you think? Go ahead! :-) -- Regards Hartmut Goebel | Hartmut Goebel | h.goe...@crazy-compilers.com | | www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |
