Hi Vagrant and Mathieu, Vagrant Cascadian writes:
> On 2020-04-23, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >> On 2020-04-23, Mathieu Othacehe wrote: >>> I reverted the U-Boot update to 2020.04 because it breaks the build of >>> u-boot-tools package. Could you please have a look? >> >> Hrm. Pretty sure it worked locally when I committed it... >> >> Unfortunately, won't have a chance to debug till next week; if anyone >> else could look into it sooner that would be great! > > I did take the time to look at the failed build log: > > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2602399/details > > But the log just cuts off for no apparent reason during the unpack > phase... I don't think the new u-boot is at fault there. > > > It built successfully on i686, armhf and aarch64 ... and the failed > x86_64 test is mysteriously absent? hrm: > > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/search?query=u-boot-tools-2020.04 > > But that's not hugely surprising, given that tests are not run on those > architectures. > > Honestly, the most of the test suite run for u-boot-tools is a generic > test suite for u-boot sandbox platforms, and most of the tests are > unrelated to what u-boot-tools actually provides, so I wonder if it's > even appropriate to run many of the tests as part of u-boot-tools... > > I'm not really sure the best way forward here. I noticed the revert today and got a chance to take a look, it seems u-boot-tools can't find sdl2: ``` make[2]: sdl2-config: Command not found make[2]: sdl2-config: Command not found make[2]: sdl2-config: Command not found make[2]: sdl2-config: Command not found ../arch/sandbox/cpu/sdl.c:10:10: fatal error: SDL2/SDL.h: No such file or directory #include <SDL2/SDL.h> ^~~~~~~~~~~~ compilation terminated. ``` Switching u-boot's dependency on sdl to sdl2 fixed it for me locally! I can send a patch tomorrow if nobody beats me to it :-) Thanks, Pierre
