Hey Ricardo, Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> writes:
> Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> writes: > >> Timothy Sample <samp...@ngyro.com> writes: >> >>> I just pushed “wip-haskell-updates-2” which integrates my work from >>> <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/39309>. I left the original branch intact >>> to make it easy to compare. >> >> I rebased this on top of “master” and pushed it as “wip-haskell”. I >> updated my changes to pandoc and pandoc-citeproc so that the statically >> linked variants are now separate packages. >> >> The evaluations on ci.guix.gnu.org failed due to a few minor bugs in the >> extra-directories code (missing “match” case for inputs with declared >> outputs, and a missing list wrapper in one package). I fixed up that >> commit [...]. Sorry for the mistakes. Thanks for fixing them up. :) > I just merged “wip-haskell” into “master” (after merging “master” into > “wip-haskell”). Fantastic! I noticed a few surprising failures like Agda and git-annex. With git-annex, I had to create a fake "static" output to appease the daemon (cf. e13fefbcffa50144d9301d67b61928ac3c964fb3). It’s a little funny, but I suppose can’t be helped until there is progress on <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/41569>. Is it true that now that “wip-haskell” is removed from Cuirass there’s no longer any way to see the build failures? I can’t find them, but my Cuirass skills are rather mediocre. :) Either way, I have fast-enough machine I can use to track down some of the other failures. Maybe I will try and do it along with the Stackage update. -- Tim
