Hello, Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2020. szept. 16., Sze, 15:25): > > Hi, > > Gábor Boskovits <[email protected]> skribis: > > > I have two reasons for that: backwards compatibility is really > > important, so we should not break it, and I believe this would not be > > hard to do. > > On the other hand it would be nice to have a more integrated backend, > > and move as many things into the services infrastructure as practical, > > and I think this is a good candidate for that. Wdyt? > > There’s already ‘setuid-program-service-type’. I think the way forward > would be to: > > 1. Define the <setuid-program> record type you propose. > > 2. Have ‘setuid-program-service-type’ accept that through its > extensions. When it receives something else, it should > transparently turn it into a <setuid-program> record, for backward > compatibility, and emit a deprecation warning. > > 3. Document the OS ‘setuid-programs’ field as taking a list of such > records. > > How does that sound?
Sounds good to me. I will have a look. > > Thanks, > Ludo’. Best regards, g_bor -- OpenPGP Key Fingerprint: 7988:3B9F:7D6A:4DBF:3719:0367:2506:A96C:CF63:0B21
