Dear Danny, On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 at 17:08, Danny Milosavljevic <dan...@scratchpost.org> wrote:
> > b. fix bugs severity:important,serious [3,4] or report > > Bug #43513 means that all armhf substitutes built for armhf on anything else > than armhf (especially those built on aarch64) are untrustworthy. > > I'm working on fixing it (Patch #43591)--but it will entail a complete rebuild > of all packages at least on all 32 bit architectures. > > If this bug is not fixed AND TESTED in time for the release, I would ask to > remove ARMHF and i686 from the list of supported systems for the time being, > and disable substitutes for armhf and i686--at least those built on a machine > that is not exactly the same (armhf and i686, respectively). > > That bug is horrible. Ouch! Thank you for working on that. I have read Bug #43513 and Patch #43591 [1,2] and the table [3] is not really encouraging. :-( If I understand correctly, the plan is to disable some architectures with this Patch #43829 [4], right? BTW, is this Bug #43720 [5] blocking for the release too? Well, what is the status and the plan about this armhf topic? [1] <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/43513> [2] <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/43591> [3] <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/43591#30> [4] <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/43829> [5] <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/43720> All the best, simon