Hi Ricardo,
On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 at 23:55, Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> wrote:
> It’s almost certainly due to configuration of the modular texlive.
> We’re generating a whole bunch of font map files and encoding files
> already, but something somewhere must still be missing.
>
> I embarked on a journey to fix this and am now deep into upgrading and
> adding TeX Live packages… The first step in fixing this is to ensure
> that all texlive-* packages contain the files that they should. The old
> texlive-* packages consisted simply of a single directory from the big
> TeX Live SVN repository. Since the addition of multiple SVN fetch and
> simple-texlive-package using it I have added a whole bunch of new
> texlive-* packages that contain all files as recorded in texlive.tlpdb.
Are you planning to commit these in the wip-texlive branch?
Is it "reasonable" to merge before the release?
> This needs to be done for all remaining old packages (you can tell they
> are old by the naming scheme: texlive-{latex,luatex,generic,fonts…}-*
> instead of just texlive-[name]).
I do not think I will have time to help in the coming days (before the
release). But I can try to at least fix the ones required by the
manual, if you have not done yet.
Cheers,
simon
