Hi, On Sun, 21 Mar 2021 at 15:04, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote:
> To me that means we should revert this patch series (perhaps with the > exception of bb2427fa28): > > 2e0ff59f0c gnu: imagemagick/fixed: Redirect old sonames to new sonames. > bb2427fa28 gnu: ImageMagick: Refer to the version number in a more robust > way. > bb5d84a048 gnu: ImageMagick: Fix version number in build configuration of > grafted replacement. > 852ba914a4 gnu: imagemagick/fixed: Retain version length for successful > grafting. > 82e887ba48 gnu: imagemagick: Update to 6.9.12-2 [security fixes]. > > After that, what we can do, is introduce 6.9.12-2 as an additional > public version of imagemagick. That way, users who run: > > guix install imagemagick > > get the newer version, the one that includes security fixes. I agree. It sounds reasonable. In the same time, is it possible to start to build the branch wip-next-release? then an ungrafted version could be pushed there and if all the substitutes are availaible on time, we could cherry-pick for the release. Cheers, simon