Léo,
On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 13:40 -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
This commit was digitally signed and pushed to the 'wip-gnome'
branch
by
Raghav, but it's also "Signed-off-by: Léo Le Bouter", so I'm
not sure
who bears primary responsibility for this one.
It seems you are more focused and spend more time sending
accusations
here than collaboratively working to improve GNU Guix. I don't
feel
like that's something great to do at all.
Please try to deescalate.
While I disagree with Mark’s earlier style and harsh tone towards
Raghav (who has been trying to get more of his older commits that
are relevant for a speedy upgrade of Gnome in shape), it seems
obvious now that Mark attempts to understand what signing off on
the changed commit means in this case – what motivated the
expansion of the scope of the commit, what resulted in not
declaring all of the significant changes.
I do think it is reasonable to expect an explanation, so that we
can collectively address the potential issue (patches removed
without upgrade), and prevent it from happening again.
Escalating the situation by insinuating bad faith does not serve
any constructive purpose. Obstructing the investigation into what
happened will only make it harder to prevent it from happening
again. It is in our shared interest to prevent problems like
this. Also note that Guix has a pretty good track record when it
comes to clear commits, so it is not unusual for long term
contributors to be at the very least confused by what has happened
here.
--
Ricardo