Il giorno mar, 01/06/2021 alle 11.11 +0200, Leo Prikler ha scritto:
> > The output could be a collection of .tar.gz files distributed > > through > > ipfs, bittorrent, syncthing or rsync > > > > Not necessarily packages in the way Guix intends them > > > > I understand there's already some work going on to reproduce > > tarballs > > in a format convenient to Guix (maybe with proper hashes and > > metadata > > ?) for when they get erased by distributors > Well, ideally Guix would have have ipfs-fetch, bittorrent-fetch etc. > as > methods or fallbacks, but this doesn't solve the problem that's posed > here. You can't just pull the complete source closure of e.g. > Fractal > over the ether and pretend it's just one package. Probably the Fractal package will depend on some others, so it's gonna be a collection 🤷️ Doesn't that happen already for traditional tarballs ? > We already drop all > vendored dependencies from tarballs, that aren't created by Rust et > al., this does the exact opposite. I'm not sure I understand This does the opposite ? How so ?
