Matt <m...@excalamus.com> writes: > ---- On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 10:21:51 -0500 zimoun <zimon.touto...@gmail.com> > wrote ---- > > > (On a side note between parenthesis, we should avoid to fall into the > > "Package Definition" tutorial fallacy; as explained here for monads > > > https://byorgey.wordpress.com/2009/01/12/abstraction-intuition-and-the-monad-tutorial-fallacy/. > > And I wrote one post about monad and another about Packaging. ;-) > > However, I think the official documentation has enough materials for > > starting to package. End of parenthesis.) > > If many people feel inclined to write their own packaging tutorial, > it's probably an indication that the manual isn't sufficient. I would > urge you and others to not fall into the "don't touch it because it's > good enough for me fallacy". Others may, and probably do, see things > differently.
I'd say it indicates that everyone has their own way of assimilating ideas. Often times we map things in our minds by means of simplifications, abuses of languages, imprecisions, etc. -- André A. Gomes "Free Thought, Free World"
