Hi guix, It sounds like a good idea, but ISTM we don't need yet another markup syntax if emacs org mode already defines a useful standard that can be adopted.
The advantage to org mode style [0] -- in commit commentary as well as tags would be its scrapability -- i.e., ease of writing an extractor/formatter for handy report snippets/pages and web stuff etc., whether implemented using foreign shell or within guix. [0] http://xahlee.info/emacs/emacs/emacs_org_markup.html On +2022-02-02 08:58:18 -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > Hi, > > Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> writes: > > > On Sun, Jan 09, 2022 at 11:54:25AM +0100, Maxime Devos wrote: > >> Hi guix reviewers and committers, > >> > >> WDYT of tagging reviewed patches that look good with a usertag, > >> e.g. 'reviewed-looks-good': > >> > >> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/pkgreport.cgi?tag=reviewed-looks-good&users=guix > >> > >> then if a committer doesn't have much time to review and hence doesn't > >> subscribe to guix-patches@, but they do trust the reviewer, they can visit > >> that URL to look for reviewed patches that can be applied. > >> > >> There could also be a tag 'reviewed-looks-good2' if the patch appears ok > >> to two reviewers, or a 'reviewed-needs-work', etc. > > > > This is a great idea. I guess we will need to adjust the software that > > runs issues.guix.gnu.org to make use of it, but in the meantime you > > should keep using this tag. Thanks! > > I like it as well. > > Maxim > -- Regards, Bengt Richter