Hello  Ludo,

Apologies for the late reply, but for some unknown reason this message was
in my spams.
I agree with the proposed licensing terms!

I hope everything is going well with Guix. I will graduate this year, so I
look forward to being more active during the summer as I really enjoyed my
Outreachy 2020 internship with the Guix Data Service.

Thank you!
Danjela

On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 11:20 AM Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote:

> Hello Andreas, Danjela, Danny, David, Laura, and Roel!
>
> I hope this message finds you well.
>
> If I’m not mistaken, you have not yet replied to my message below, also
> visible at
> <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-02/threads.html>.
>
> Could you take a look?
>
> Replying today is a good way to show your love for free software.  :-)
> #ilovefs 💖
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Ludo’.
>
> Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> skribis:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am emailing you on behalf of the GNU Guix project because you are the
> > author or coauthor of one or more articles to the blog at
> > <https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog>.
> >
> > With a few exceptions, these articles do not have a clear license, which
> > we would like to fix.  We propose to dual-license all the articles under
> > CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections,
> > no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.
> >
> > Do you agree with the proposed licensing terms for your contributions to
> > the blog?
> >
> > If you do, please reply to this message to say so, keeping
> > guix-devel@gnu.org Cc’d (if you already replied in the previous thread,
> > you do not need to reply again).
> >
> > If you would prefer different licensing terms, or if you have any
> > questions, feel free to ask them publicly on guix-devel@gnu.org or
> > privately with guix-maintain...@gnu.org.
> >
> > The clarified license will allow us and others to reuse material in the
> > manual, cookbook, and in other free cultural works.  See
> > <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-01/msg00389.html>
> > for the initial discussion.
> >
> > Thanks in advance!
> >
> > Ludo’.
>

Reply via email to