Hi! Josselin Poiret <d...@jpoiret.xyz> skribis:
> As an aside: is there anything preventing us from having do notation à > la Haskell? This could help bridge mlet and mbegin with >>=, which in > its current form is impractical. Here's what it could look like: > > (mdo %store-monad > (drv <- (gexp-derivation "myderivation" test-gexp)) > (output <- (return (derivation->output-path drv))) > (built-derivations (list drv)) > (return (format #t "~a~%" output))) I guess we could do that, though it seems to me like a marginal improvement over ‘mbegin’ and ‘mlet’. Ludo’.
