Hi zimoun, > Maybe it could be better to move the ’cabal-revision’ from the > ’arguments’ field to the ’origin’ field. > Perhaps, we could have a ’cabal-revision’ procedure returning a G-exp > and put it under the ’snippet’ field. > WDYT? it would be awesome to have that functionality and I agree that a “combining” origin putting the .cabal file in the right spot would be ideal. Not sure how to build that though, any ideas?
> That’s said, it is a core-updates change because it requires to modify > the Haskell build-system and, a rough estimate about the number of > impacted packages: There’s a branch wip-haskell waiting to be worked on. Lars
