Hi,
On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 at 20:25, "(" <pa...@disroot.org> wrote:
> On Fri Nov 18, 2022 at 8:22 PM GMT, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
>> Yes — as ‘guix open’ — but it would make a nice addition to ‘guix
>> show’.
>
> How would that interact with ``guix package --show''? Perhaps it might
> be better to add a ``guix package --open'' option?
Currently “guix show” is an alias of “guix package --show=” and we could
start to do the contrary, “guix package --show=” would be using “guix
show”. Mainly for maintaining backward compatibility. But “guix show”
could evolve this own way supporting options that would not be supported
by legacy “guix package --show=”. WDYT?
It would avoid some headache. ;-)
Cheers,
simon
