Hi, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes: [...] >> I imagine we could develop more convenient services like this, such as a >> basic command scheduler similar to the ‘at’ command, and a syslogd >> implementation. The latter could be nice for a couple of reasons: >> logging would happen from the start and till the end (an improvement >> over the external syslogd process), and it could let us provide a nicer >> user interface to view logs (taking inspiration from that of >> ‘journalctl’). >> >> Thoughts? Ideas? > > While I also find the journalctl interface to be convenient, the > underlying database logs is costly in terms of storage and complexity Agreed (that’s why I mentioned the user interface of ‘journalctl’, not the storage mechanism of ‘journald’). Ludo’.
