Hello, On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 08:08 PM, Andreas Enge wrote:
> Am Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 09:47:06AM -0600 schrieb Katherine Cox-Buday: >> I disagree with this because it seems like Mesa moves along at a pretty >> brisk pace and I feel like we'd be constantly recreating the same branch: >> 23.1.3, 2023-06-22 (14 days) >> 23.1.2, 2023-06-08 ( 9 days) >> 23.0.4, 2023-05-30 ( 5 days) >> 23.1.1, 2023-05-25 (15 days) >> 23.1.0, 2023-05-10 > > I doubt we would be able to move at such a brisk pace and update mesa > every other week! It is a package with more than 4000 dependents, so in > any case it would be good to regroup with somewhat related changes. > Since the Cuirass job remains, I don't think it is really any extra work or not to recreate the branch as needed, if that is preferred. I'll defer to whatever people want, we can always change our mind if anything comes up. As for the pace, on the main 23.1.x releases we see about 2 weeks currently. If that is a bit fast I think about once a month is a reasonable pace, maybe depending if it is a small bugfix release or what other changes we may need causing other rebuilds to be grouped on the branch. We can slow down if major changes are introduced, but seems Mesa is moving along without breaking changes or major changes in building/support these days. As you can follow along on <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/64369> within a couple of days x86_64 and i686 had good weather (though I can't see specifically what may have broken yet) while as we'd expect things like aarch64 are still churning away. The speed of this build job might determine how fast we can go anyway, but waiting too long will mean a new minor release to build :) John
