Hi, Thanks for these pointers. Therefore I am asking more naive questions. :-)
On Tue, 5 Sept 2023 at 21:19, Csepp <raingl...@riseup.net> wrote: > There are mbox downloads on lists.sr.ht. > Random example from my browser history: > https://lists.sr.ht/~lioploum/forevercomputer If I understand correctly, this <https://lists.sr.ht/~whereiseveryone/guixrus/patches> is the equivalent to Debbugs (guix-patches) with a front-end as Mumi. However, it adds CI feedback. What is confusing is the lack of clear links between all these: https://lists.sr.ht/~whereiseveryone/guixrus and https://git.sr.ht/~whereiseveryone/guixrus and https://todo.sr.ht/~whereiseveryone/guixrus and https://builds.sr.ht/~whereiseveryone/guixrus. How do you know that the patch had already been applied? There is the term APPLIED appearing in the web front-end. How can I fetch this information without opening my web-browser? What is the equivalent of <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>? How can I download the messages of e.g., https://todo.sr.ht/~whereiseveryone/guixrus ? Well, I am probably asking too much at this step of the discussion, but let ask. :-) I have a bridge from the Emacs front-end of Debbugs that downloads all the messages from a thread corresponding to one specific issue; all from Emacs and without opening any webbrowser. Would it be possible to do the same with Sourcehut? When I read my emails from my email client, I would like to be able to download the complete thread of the email I am reading; for instance, that matters when someone replies to an old bug that I do not have yet locally. I mean, I am sure all will be possible. :-) Instead, I am asking: is it already possible? As Maxim said elsewhere [1], one good thing from Debbugs is the integration with Emacs. Yeah, I know that some of us are maybe too much Emacs-centric. :-) Even if the Debbugs SOAP interface is clunky, the package emacs-debbugs provides enough procedures for writing custom helpers. For example, when I process my emails using emacs-notmuch, I can quickly mark some bugs, say tagging moreinfo, the sequence is I hit is: b C moreinfo RET. Or I can check the status of the bug I read from my email, I just press: C. My question is not about will it be possible? It will, because Sourcehut exposes an API. :-) My question is: is it already possible? For instance, emacs-srht seems able to only interact with the Git and Paste services. People not using Emacs and using Sourcehut for other projects, how do you interact with the Sourcehut lists patch submission from your email client without using your web-browser? Or with the Sourcehut todo bug tracker from your email client without using your web-browser? 1: Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors? Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> Mon, 04 Sep 2023 22:18:22 -0400 id:87edjdqs5t....@gmail.com https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2023-09 https://yhetil.org/guix/87edjdqs5t....@gmail.com Cheers, simon PS: > I think the UI is pretty clear. Well, I am probably not the only one confused by the UI of Sourcehut. :-) https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2021-12/msg02159.html
