paul writes: Dear Paul,
> On 9/23/23 09:37, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen wrote: >> Nathan Dehnel writes: >> >>> I don't use emacs either (because it's so impenetrable) >> Emacs might be somewhat different from what you know, but this is utter >> bollocks. > > Thank you for your opinion but it's just that: a subjective judgement > based on your own episodic experience. I'm sorry if my tone was too harsh, I now realise this is still triggering old pain. Why is it still OK to for people to keep spreading negative anecdotes about Emacs, and problematic to refute them or counter them with positive anecdotes? It's been me believing exactly such lies that scared me away from starting with Emacs for years, lost years in a way; something I deeply regret: this has to stop. Greetings, Janneke -- Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond https://LilyPond.org Freelance IT https://www.JoyOfSource.com | Avatar® https://AvatarAcademy.com
