On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 13:45:04 +0000 Luis Felipe <sirga...@zoho.com> wrote:
> El 21/06/24 a las 10:44, MSavoritias escribió: > > On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 11:46:56 +0200 > > Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> wrote: > > > >> Am Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 11:14:18AM +0300 schrieb MSavoritias: > >>> Aside from that even Guix uploading all code from the packages to > >>> SWH that basically feeds it to a LLM model is indeed not honoring consent > >>> of the author of the package. > >> Guix does not upload code to SWH. It gives them a pointer to a public git > >> repository that SWH then harvests or not according to their rules (see my > >> reply to Dale yesterday). These are not the same things at all. > > This is bikeshedding and arguing on schemantics. Guix gives them a url to > > download the source code from, so ultimately we (the Guix project) is > > responsible for the code showing up in there. > > Lets not argue over schemantics like this. It is even posted on their > > website in case you want to argue otherwise > > https://www.softwareheritage.org/2019/04/18/software-heritage-and-gnu-guix-join-forces-to-enable-long-term-reproducibility/ > > > > I think the differentiation between sending code and sending a URL is > necessary. Saying that Guix sends your code or your source files to SWH > leads people to think that Guix *will* transmit those files from your > local machine over the Internet to SWH machines when you run "guix lint > YOUR_PRIVATE_PACKAGE". And that's not the case, is it? But I didnt say that tho did I? the context you are reading as from the quote is Guix uploading all code from its packages to SWH. Not any private repos. So i have no idea what you are reffering to here tbh. MSavoritias
