On 5/1/26 11:30, Andreas Enge wrote:
Hello,
for those who are taking part in the little game without rules
to act on one debbugs issue per day:
https://lite.framacalc.org/debbugs-mrtglssuf5-ajj9
I have taken the liberty to erase columns going more than one month back,
since the spreadsheet was becoming unwieldy.
Everybody is welcome to join going forward!
Can you perhaps add some guidance on how to proceed with these tickets?
I clicked some random ones.
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/47884
"[PATCH] Add package: ibus-chewing"
Easy, that package was added, so I closed it.
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/70545
"[PATCH 0/2] gnu: Add soupault."
soupault has apparently not been added to Guix. I could copy the
patches into a pull request, but then I create a P.R. for a package that
I don't have a particular interest in. Is that useful? It doesn't feel
useful.
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/47906
"[PATCH 00/22] Add Spyder"
There is already work in progress towards spyder on codeberg (also by
Vinicius Monego), https://codeberg.org/guix/guix/pulls/7670 , so I
suppose it can just be closed? But the patch set has not been
completely transferred to codeberg, so I don't feel comfortable closing it.
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/53931
"[PATCH] gnu: Add python-onlykey-solo-python"
There is an unfinished discussion between the author and the reviewer.
I don't have anything meaningful to add.
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/51536
"openblas builds not reproducible on different x86_64 machines"
I could not (immediately) reproduce the problem, but at first glance it
seems that there are no remedies applied, so I guess the problem is
probably still there.
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/61675
"[PATCH 0/2] gnu: Add latino."
Again, I could copy this to a codeberg P.R., is that the idea?
So, of the 6 issues, I only knew what to do with 1 of them.
Hugo
