Greg Hogan <[email protected]> writes: > This is not applicable to our project as GNU and Guix do not take > ownership, only requiring the contribution be licensed. LLM output is > licensable so your concerns are allayed.
i do not believe you can license products of the public domain — which llm output is, at least in some places — as there are no property rights to assert. if you know otherwise, can you direct me to those sources? i would find it very strange, but the law is often strange. i don't know what that means for including significant llm code in gpl licensed works, though i suspect it means you can't do it. again, i'd love to see actual legal arguments that cover this. -bjc
