On 2026-05-29 at 14:28+09:00, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to see if we can build consensus on the removal of the > Change-Id git trailer, as proposed in > <https://codeberg.org/guix/guix/pulls/1740> (and hinted at in GCD-003). > > For context, the Change-Id hook was initially added so that we could > eventually have a system with Mumi where we it could scan for issues to > close automatically if a PR commit(s) Change-Ids had already been added > to the tree. This hasn't materialized, and now that we are on Codeberg, > we're still carrying the mildly annoying Change-Ids as a legacy, which > get in the way when amending commit messages. > > They provide some value in that you can search Codeberg for a Change-Id > to find the PR in which it was reviewed/merged, but I doubt many of us > are using this on a regular basis (?). I'd also propose that if this is > important to us we should look into baking it in a git commit header > instead [0], which would both be more robust and remove the commit > message clutter. > > Any thoughts? > > [0] some related discussion: > <https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/T/#m2e6a57d8aeefd3146c7632e89dc36e2a0a8f68ba> > > -- > Thanks, > Maxim
Re: Consensus on removal of Change-Id commit-msg hook/git trailer?
Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution. Fri, 29 May 2026 08:12:22 -0700
- Consensus on remo... Maxim Cournoyer
- Re: Consensu... Andreas Enge
- Re: Cons... Cayetano Santos
- Re: Consensu... Sughosha
- Re: Consensu... Ludovic Courtès
- Re: Cons... Rutherther
- Re: Cons... Cayetano Santos
- Re: Consensu... Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
