Hello Simon!

...sorry for the OT, I'm referencing an old message: 
https://yhetil.org/guix/[email protected]/ .  Anyway.

Consider this message a form of /nostalgia/ from an _old_ nerd, if you want 
call it a rant.  Anyway.

On 2026-05-18, Simon Tournier wrote:

> Well, I’ll not comment on Codeberg because it makes the discussion
> impossible to follow.  And later, it makes very hard to look for
> something and come back, and worse the comment to one specific part will
> be then detached to this very same specific part after some force pushed
> modifying the number of lines.  Anyway.

Anyway? :-)

Today I'm trying to follow the patch history and related discussion about the 
now withdrawn GCD 008 [2] and I'm having a hard time _tracing_ comments 
_related_ to the document status (aka commit) at the time comments was posted 
[1], especially because there are no (unambiguously human readeable) _patches_ 
attached to each comment.

Is it wrong if I say we passed from a situation where "the discussion was hard 
to follow (because you had to use a text-only-safe MUA, be able ti read a patch 
and use some useful helping tools)" to a situation where "the discussion is 
impossible to follow" (even if you are very experienced in information 
retrieval) as you said above?

[...]

>> genAI is already being used within the community.  Our goal is not to
>> judge what individuals are doing.  Instead, this proposal aims at
>> setting a standard for what we do collectively within the project.
>
> I propose to reword:

So Someone™ had to (should) hand-apply (or make a proper patch for) _each_ 
proposed "patch" to the original document (the GCD 008 in this case) instead of 
apply it with a patch handling tool? :-)

AFAIU the same holds for each and every proposed change I saw in this thread by 
now (still reading).

[...]

Surely there must be something I'm missing here.  Anyway.

Happy hacking! Gio'


[1] I'm trying to follow this thread [2] in my MUA side-by-side with 
https://codeberg.org/guix/guix-consensus-documents/pulls/13/commits and it's... 
mind-blowing to me :-O

[2] https://yhetil.org/guix/[email protected]/

-- 
Giovanni Biscuolo

Xelera IT Infrastructures

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to