On Sat, 2026-10-03 at 05:42 -0700, Marius Bakke wrote: > "mr.doojin" <[email protected]> writes: > > > I don't like the idea of merging a vibe-coded component in guix > > core. > > What gives you the impression that goodev is vibe-coded? > > > Replacing eudev with udev shouldn't be difficult for guix > > maintainers. I prefer udev to goodev if goodev is vibe-coded. > > systemd allows LLM-assisted commits, and these changes trickle down > to > eudev, so it's not much better. At least goodev is written in a > language we all know and love! :-)
Hi, I’m concerned that replacing components just because we prefer the language is not a good reason. There already exists many implementations of udev, it would be good to at least produce an in-depth comparison before jumping to a personal favorite. Why are we trying to replace eudev in the first place? The same goes with rewriting libudev in Rust: great, you just produced the same software, but without the security updates, the maintainers and the years of community around it. Please, avoid replacing core libraries and components in Guix without a very good reason. Have a nice day, Noé
