Ricardo Wurmus <[email protected]> skribis: > Vibed software that Ludo mentioned is like abandoned pet > projects. This doesn't really have a place in Guix. Most of these > pieces of software are disposable. We have rejected other software in > the past out of concerns for a lack of quality and poor upstream > practises. > > This is not primarily about the fact that the authors (human > triggers?) use LLMs; it is just that this is what makes the software > so disposable as to be unfit for Guix.
💯 “Poor quality” can be a criterion but it’s more subjective than “vibe-coded”; lack of popularity is not necessarily a good criterion, except in the extreme case of single-user vibe-coded software. I think, as a first step, what we could do is agree that there are packages that we, committers, may choose to reject on the basis of criteria such as these. Ludo’.
