Aqui Tanenbaum tiene un buen punto, que es en lo �nico que en mi opini�n Linux aplica la palabra "obsoleto". Tiene la idea de Java ahora con respecto a Portabilidad. Sin embargo como dice Linus, Portabilidad no es el �nico aspecto de un buen SO. y Linux sali� con muchas cosas buenas que lo hicieron tan popular. Es una l�stima que la Naci�n no siguiera leyendo los mails de esta lista y saliera con esa sandes de decir que Linux es obsoleto!!

Tanenbaum escribi�...
http://www2.educ.umu.se/~bjorn/mhonarc-files/obsolete/msg00009.html

My point is that writing a new operating system that is closely tied to any
particular piece of hardware, especially a weird one like the Intel line,
is basically wrong. An OS itself should be easily portable to new hardware
platforms. When OS/360 was written in assembler for the IBM 360
25 years ago, they probably could be excused. When MS-DOS was written
specifically for the 8088 ten years ago, this was less than brilliant, as
IBM and Microsoft now only too painfully realize. Writing a new OS only for the
386 in 1991 gets you your second 'F' for this term. But if you do real well
on the final exam, you can still pass the course.


-------





Victor Bendig
Tel 371 64 12

_________________________________________________________________
Charla con tus amigos en l�nea mediante MSN Messenger: http://messenger.yupimsn.com/



-- Desuscripci�n: escriba a [EMAIL PROTECTED], tema 'unsubscribe' Problemas a: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.or.cr/listas



Responder a