IMHO this is a not a good idea. What do you do with a table that is half-sorted or half-filtered? The data in such a table is inconsistent.
If you want your attribute tables to sort faster, you can add indices in your DBMS for the columns you need to sort on. If you want to work with a sample of your data, then you should use a proper method to draw a random sample. Just my two cents. Best, Ben On 11/23/2012 12:09 AM, Manuel Madrid wrote: > Hi Woflgang, > > I agree it is interesting, not only in this process but in general. > > We'll try to take it into account in future versions. I opened a feature > request [1] in our issue management system. > > Best regards, > Manuel. > > [1] https://devel.gvsig.org/redmine/issues/1423 > > El 16/11/12 14:20, Wolfgang Qual escribió: >> Dear developers, >> >> sorting huge tables (~150.000 records) in gvSIG or applying filters on >> such tables sometimes takes long, especially when using oracle spatial >> layers. >> In such cases, it would be great, if it would be possible to stop the >> filtering/sorting process. What about adding a button "cancel sorting" >> ord "cancel filtering" etc.? >> Any comments will be appreciated very much! >> >> Best regards and nice weekend! >> Wolfgang >> >> >> > -- Benjamin Ducke {*} Geospatial Consultant {*} GIS Developer bendu...@fastmail.fm _______________________________________________ Gvsig_internacional mailing list Gvsig_internacional@listserv.gva.es To see the archives, edit your preferences or unsubscribe from this mailing list, please access this url: http://listserv.gva.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gvsig_internacional
