Hi,
Thanks to the work of Jorge Piera they are really based on the ISO
19107:2003 [1], which "specifies conceptual schemas for describing the
spatial characteristics of geographic features".
GML (ISO 19136:2007) [2] is a XML encoding compliant with the previous
ISO, so geometry types are similar to gvSIG's.
Regards.
[1]
http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=26012
[2]
http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=32554
El 06/06/13 17:26, Jordi Torres escribió:
Hi Fran,
That names are based in the GML specification AFAIK.
Cheers.
2013/6/6 Francisco Puga <fp...@cartolab.es <mailto:fp...@cartolab.es>>
Hi Cesar,
There is any reason to choose that names, surface and so on, instead
the more common denominations?
2013/6/6 Simon Cropper <simoncrop...@fossworkflowguides.com
<mailto:simoncrop...@fossworkflowguides.com>>:
> > Simon, would you be able to share the shapefile with us so we
can try
> > to find what is happening?
>
> I have I sent them to Joaquin del Cerro
>
> On 06/06/13 19:43, Cèsar Ordiñana wrote:
>> El 06/06/13 10:44, Simon Cropper escribió:
>>> Jukka,
>>>
>>> To be honest nor have I.
>>>
>>> This is what is reported in the gvSIG layer properties dialog.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The MultiSurface3D type is the gvSIG geometry type name, not
the Shape
>> type name, as it is independent of the data source type.
>>
>> The relationship between gvSIG geometry types and the shapefile
ones is,
>> more or less:
>>
>> - Surface: Polygon
>> - Curve: Polyline
>> - Point: Point
>> - 3D: Z
>> - 2D: Nothing
>>
>> We share the prefix "Multi" and when we add support for
geometries with
>> "M" it will be added as a suffix also.
>>
>> So a Shape of Polyline type should become a Curve2D in gvSIG, a
Shape of
>> PolygonZ type must become a Surface3D, ... In the case of a
MultiPatch
>> Shape, maybe it would become a MultiSurface2D or
MultiSurface3D, but I'm
>> not sure if this is being taken into account in the current
code. Anyway
>> I suppose this is not the case of Simon's shape file, so it
seems to me
>> there is a bug in the information shown in the layer properties
dialog.
>>
>> Simon, would you be able to share the shapefile with us so we
can try to
>> find what is happening? If I understood you well, the file is
opened in
>> gvSIG but the editing and geoprocessing tools don't work with
it. Is
>> that so?
>>
>> Regards.
>>
--
Cèsar Ordiñana Navarro
gvSIG software architect
DiSiD Technologies (http://www.disid.com)
_______________________________________________
Gvsig_internacional mailing list
Gvsig_internacional@listserv.gva.es
To see the archives, edit your preferences or unsubscribe from this mailing
list, please access this url:
http://listserv.gva.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gvsig_internacional
