Its not that the netbook is cheap, its built to fill a niche for some
people. Its also underpowered to allow the netbook to run on the battery
which is probably not near as hefty as those of laptops.
Toy computers? The Commodore 64 might have been considered to fit in
that class yet it outperformed other computers in its heyday.
Quote of the nanosecond. . .
"Its a pretty poor dog that won't wag its own tail."
Robert & Dreamer Doll ke7nwn
E-mail-
[email protected]
Home Page-
http://webpages.charter.net/dog_guide/
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Belle" <[email protected]>
To: "Petty, Richard" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 8:04 AM
Subject: RE: Netbook Recommendations with Window-Eyes
Not supprised.
People are fooled by the specs on a netbook, they think because it says
1.8 it must be atleast somewhat fast, but it's not.
By the time you factor in the differences in instruction sets between a
netbook and even a plain jane pentium 4, and the reduced bus speed, and
memory bandwidth, your really running something like a 700 mhz pentium 3
machine.
Why do you think these things are so cheap?
There are also different types of computing, things that need floating
point will really suck on a netbook.
So you really do get what you pay for, netbooks are for college kids
writing papers, or to do light browsing and im, not for serious computing.
They also suck on most things audio, one of my students insisted on trying
to run sonar 7 on a netbook, and we went through all sorts of issues
before she upgraded.
Despite the improvements in efficiency ms has given w7 over the sorry
vista os, it's still more of a hog than xp.
So xp will generally run better on a netbook.
I know they're making these things a bit beefyer these days, but they're
still kind of like toy computers.
People like them because they're so small, but never make the mistake of
thinking your going to get anything like the performance you'll get from a
decent processor, even one a couple generations older.
At 09:25 AM 6/21/2010, Petty, Richard wrote:
Let me underscore one of Karen's points about Windows 7 on a Netbook. I
moved to a Samsung netbook to take advantage of the better keyboard. The
unit I purchased only came with Windows 7 Home. Even with 2 Gb memory
installed, the Samsung has ben excessively slow with WE 7.2. I may attempt
to purchase a copy of XP home and install that on the Samsung or replace
the unit as soon as I can.
Richard Petty
ILRU - Independent Living Research Utilization
[email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: Karyn Campbell [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 8:10 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Netbook Recommendations with Window-Eyes
Janet,
Stay away from the Dell as the memory on that is not upgradeable as of
last
August. When we bought our Asus netbooks. Also with the Dell, the
function
key does not behave as expected.
I'm running XP on my netbook as it was recommended at the time that one
not
get Windows 7 on a netbook. Keep in mind that this was prior to Windows 7
coming out.
We run 2 gb of RAM in our netbooks, having had that upgraded at the time
of
purchase.
HTH.
Karyn Campbell, Illinois USA, [email protected]
Using WE 7.2 on Toshiba laptop running Vista home premium SP 1 32 bit with
Office 2007 and IE 7 along with Asus netbook running XP home 32 bit with
Office 2007 and IE 7 with AVG 8.5 free on both machines.
Check out my blog at packerbackerkaryn.blogspot.com
Follow me on twitter at www.twitter.com/packerbackerkar
If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender
only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is
related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to
[email protected] so the entire list will receive it.
GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can
manage your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.
If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender
only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is
related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to
[email protected] so the entire list will receive it.
GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can
manage your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.
WARNING!!!
This email could contain innocent phrases which, if taken out of context,
or read from an existing inclination to be hostile, or an overly
politically correct world view could induce cursing, abusive language, or
other indications of less than desirable behavior in a public venue.
No ill will is intended.
The sender takes no responsibility for mis-interpretation or otherwise
extrapolated extended meaning, intent, or purposes implied or imagined
from said phrases.
The receiver of any such email containing such phrases is solely
responsible for good
interpretation and intelligent deployment of subsequent responses to the
above communication.
If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender
only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is
related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to
[email protected] so the entire list will receive it.
GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can
manage your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.
If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only.
If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to
GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so
the entire list will receive it.
GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can manage
your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.
