On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 01:27:07PM +0100, David Nečas (Yeti) wrote:
> There might be some subtle bug, but basically the output seems correct.
> How things correspond between the direct and requency space?
>
> Direct space Frequency space
> ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
> Pixel size Δx Image size 2π/Δx
> Pixel size Δy Image size 2π/Δy
> Image size Lx Pixel size 2π/Lx
> Image size Ly Pixel size 2π/Ly
I should have complemented the table with the numbers of pixels in each
dimension:
Direct space Frequency space
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Resolution Nx Resolution Nx
Resolution Mx Resolution Mx
They are the same in direct and fequency. But one needs to take this
into account explicitly to make sense of things...
Regards,
Yeti
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For
Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between.
Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Gwyddion-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwyddion-users
