I really does make more  sense that they are metal eyelets. There doesn't seem 
to be any sign of attachment of the ones on the dress - unless the little black 
marks are thread to hold it down.  

Thanks!

Sg
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
  Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 1:37 PM
  Subject: [h-cost] Re: Eyelets or Buttons


  It seems worth mentioning that there have been archaeological finds  
  from this general time period of actual grommets/metal eyelets.   
  Granted, the ones I know of were found in London, but since London (no  
  offense intended!) was a bit of a fashion backwater at the time, it  
  seems at least reasonable to me theorize, on seeing something that  
  looks like a metal grommet on a fashionable portait, that you actually  
  are seeing a metal grommet!

  Geoff Egan's "Material Culture in London in an Age of Transition"  
  (c1450-c1700) describes the following on page 53:
  Copper alloy
  229: ...late 15th/early 16th century... Diam 13mm; consists of two  
  opposed convex sheet rings, a smaller one (Diam 11mm) with a tubular  
  extension on the back which has been inserted through the center of  
  the other and the end bent over to fix it in place (rather in the  
  manner of a rivet); now-black coating on both sides; traces of leather  
  survive.
  230: ...c1550-c1650 As 229
  Lead/tin
  231: ...c1500-c1550 Worn; D-shaped, overall approximate Diam 13 x  
  12mm; pair of opposed, tear-like forms flank the central hole, beading  
  along sides; stylized floral motif on the flat side; two rivets.

  Egan also points back to "Dress Accessories c1150-c1450" pp 227-8, fig  
  142, for a similar but simpler version of 231, dated to the late 14th  
  century.

  Here's a rather crappy scan of the illustration:
  
http://www.formfunction.org/temp/img045.jpg<http://www.formfunction.org/temp/img045.jpg>
  Though it seems to me that the cross-section illustrations don't  
  really match the text description, so I'm not sure which is more  
  accurate.

  Granted, these probably aren't (as far as we know) from women's  
  clothing, especially 229, but still.

  -E House
  _______________________________________________
  h-costume mailing list
  h-costume@mail.indra.com<mailto:h-costume@mail.indra.com>
  
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume<http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume>
_______________________________________________
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

Reply via email to