From: Sylvia Rognstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Historical Costume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Historical Costume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [h-cost] new Butterick pattern 5061
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 18:18:07 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624)
Received: from www1.indra.com ([209.169.0.7]) by
bay0-mc6-f14.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Wed, 2
May 2007 17:18:51 -0700
Received: from net.indra.com (net.indra.com [204.144.142.1])by
www1.indra.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id
l430IQ96053211(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256
verify=OK);Wed, 2 May 2007 18:18:26 -0600 (MDT)(envelope-from
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from net.indra.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])by net.indra.com
(8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l430IHkr071946;Wed, 2 May 2007 18:18:22 -0600
(MDT)(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from rwcrmhc15.comcast.net (rwcrmhc15.comcast.net
[216.148.227.155])by net.indra.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id
l430IE5Y071879for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 2 May 2007 18:18:15 -0600
(MDT)(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from
[192.168.1.2](c-71-196-218-99.hsd1.co.comcast.net[71.196.218.99])by
comcast.net (rwcrmhc15) with SMTPid <20070503001808m15007nmh2e>; Thu, 3 May
2007 00:18:08 +0000
X-Message-Info:
LsUYwwHHNt2yG3f+3DmPOSrAeQBwEMtYGyCJ0Mzf5F83SYs4Yhl5mnh7m57zeg8w
References:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.624)
X-DCC-indra.com-Metrics: net.indra.com 1044; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 rep=2%
X-BeenThere: h-costume@mail.indra.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Historical Costume <h-costume.mail.indra.com>
List-Unsubscribe:
<http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume>,<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://net.indra.com/pipermail/h-costume>
List-Post: <mailto:h-costume@mail.indra.com>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe:
<http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume>,<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 May 2007 00:18:51.0682 (UTC)
FILETIME=[A09E7820:01C78D18]
On May 2, 2007, at 6:11 PM, Carmen Beaudry wrote:
On May 2, 2007, at 5:54 PM, LLOYD MITCHELL wrote:
This reminds me of.......
One thing I am sure of is that the armseye of the upper garments will
not be as high as the originals nor the bottoms as capacious . These
would grace any stage quite nicely.
That sounds like a veiled insult to theatrical costume designers.
Sylrog
I sure didn't take it as such.
Melusine (who started out in theater and still does theater costume part
time)
You didn't? Am I just being overly sensitive? I often feel like
historical re-enactors and reproducers of accurate historical costumes look
down their noses to a certain extent at theatrical costume designers
because the latter don't usually attempt complete authenticity.
Sylrog
And with good reason - someimes changes are soooooo fast you cn't be
historically accurate and velcro saves the day and the costume!
Paula
_______________________________________________
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
_________________________________________________________________
Get a FREE Web site, company branded e-mail and more from Microsoft Office
Live! http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/mcrssaub0050001411mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
