I see you haven't received a response in the past 4 hours. I only received
it once.
LynnD


On 2/20/08, zelda crusher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Is it just me, or has everyone received these last three posts several
> times?
>
> Laurie
>
> > Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:31:42 -0800> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [h-cost] Money & weights in accounts>
> CC: > > > At 01:43 19/02/2008, you wrote:> > > > "the foreparte of the
> George of Dyamountes the Mayle> > > > of the curates and Rivet of the same
> of Siluer half> > > > gilte with a sworde in his hand of gold a lozenged> >
> > > Dyamounte like a sheelde and a Dragon of gold weying> > > > together iij
> oz di di quarter"> > > >> > > > "a little George of gold to hang at a Collar
> of> > > > garters weying one ounce quarter di"> > > >> > > > Thanks for any
> help with this.> > > >> > > > Kimiko> > >> > >Joan, I believe, has the right
> explanation for the above citation, but> > >be careful. In some cases, a
> reference will be clear that the odd> > >units refer to money rather than
> weight. Such as:> > >> > >'Item for the lynyng and mendyng of 2 vardgales
> 14d.' 1555. Petrie Archives> > >> > >In this example, the costs are is 14d,
> where the d is denarius = a> > >unit of money. I'm not clear how or why the
> Brits kept using d to> > >refer to the old shilling coin. Perhaps it was a
> silver coin just as> > >the roman denarius was? I leave to someone from the
> other side of the> > >pond to explain further.> >> > I believe that "d" is
> actually pence, not> > shillings, in English money. We used to have,> >
> prior to decimalisation on 15/2/71, a system of> > pounds, shillings and
> pence, shortened to £.s.d.> > Therefore the "14d" mentioned above is
> actually> > 14 pence, not shillings. I will try and check the> > origins of
> the notation - but am busy, so it might take a while.> >> > Suzi> > Thanks
> Suzi (and nice to hear from you!)> Were there silver pennies in the 16th c?
> Still stuck on the denarius> thing, ya see,> > And BTW, Kimiko, that's one
> big diamond & George jewel that you've got> described there. The three oz of
> gold alone makes a pricey bauble at> today's rates.> --cin> Cynthia Barnes>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________>
> h-costume mailing list> h-costume@mail.indra.com>
> http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
> _________________________________________________________________
> Helping your favorite cause is as easy as instant messaging. You IM, we
> give.
>
> http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/Home/?source=text_hotmail_join_______________________________________________
> h-costume mailing list
> h-costume@mail.indra.com
> http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
>
_______________________________________________
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

Reply via email to