At 00:02 06/05/2008, you wrote:
>I think it was from the Museum of London site. The pocket I believe said
>that it was listed at about 1620. There are very few pockets from pre1600s.
>Presently I can not find the site.

The embroidery seems very 18th century to me - are you sure it was 
1620? I have looked at a large number of pockets, and pictures of, 
for a small project I am working on, and have never seen one dated 
that early. Some of the MoL items are not always dated accurately, or 
with a very wide range of dates, as I have found while working there, 
as a volunteer.

Suzi

>De
>
>-----Original Message-----
>I really like that pocket and would be interested in embroidering a replica.
>I couldn't back out of the link to find the page with the pocket
>description, date, materials, etc.  Could someone please direct me to that
>part of the site?
>Julie
>
>----  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > If you are talking about 1500s the you might look for pocket pouches.
> > http://vads.ahds.ac.uk/images/PHS/floral_pocket.jpg
> > To my understanding these were wore under their skirts. It is believed
>that
> > the skirts had a slit in them for easy access or in some cases where the
> > pocket is between the under skirt and the over skirt, the over skirt would
> > be hiked up for access.
>  De
> >
>_______________________________________________
>h-costume mailing list
>h-costume@mail.indra.com
>http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>h-costume mailing list
>h-costume@mail.indra.com
>http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

_______________________________________________
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

Reply via email to